From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Davis Subject: Re: email -> TODO items? Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:32:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1389011547.14855.67131945.335B94EE@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20140105144652.GF385@pfdstudio-air.home> <2014-01-06T11-49-26@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W09M8-0004Hd-Fy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:32:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W09M4-0005Jb-DF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:32:32 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:41885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W09M4-0005JX-9H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:32:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2014-01-06T11-49-26@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mon, Jan 6, 2014, at 05:51 AM, Karl Voit wrote: > * Peter Davis wrote: > > > > Sometimes it's much quicker and easier to email myself notes on things > > to do. > > Using email for a todo management system has many disadvantages. I > read a *lot* about those attempts. > > For the purpose you were mentioning, I am using MobileOrg (Android) > to quickly capture notes about todos. This way, I get those todos in > my inbox.org and refile them every other day. > Thanks for the suggestions. I'll look into them. Strictly speaking, these are not TODO items, but ideas and notes for blog posts I may want to write. The email approach has been ok, but since I typically expand on these short notes in org-mode, it would be useful to be able to import them directly. But I'll certainly look at these alternatives. Thanks! -pd -- Peter Davis www.techcurmudgeon.com