From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom Breton (Tehom)" Subject: Re: Org-choose Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:29:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1320.24.63.20.74.1234564148.squirrel@mail.panix.com> References: <273688C0-9A36-47D5-B747-A1371C2BD05A@uva.nl> <1782.65.96.63.84.1234471662.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <5E0C3EFF-06FA-4446-B869-F514B6748C5E@uva.nl> <1036.24.63.20.74.1234553649.squirrel@mail.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LY6X3-0000BW-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:29:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LY6X1-0000Ad-GK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:29:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56381 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LY6X1-0000AF-5P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:29:11 -0500 Received: from mail2.panix.com ([166.84.1.73]:49887) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LY6X0-0006U5-Sx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:29:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Hi Tom, > > thanks, this patch seems to fix at least the problem I was having. Glad to hear it! > I see that you now require 'cl also during runtime, which is > probably (?) because you are also calling some functions, > not only macros? Yes. The configuration difficulties made me think about that, and I realized I really should do it cleanly. > If we decide to move org-choose into the Org core at some point, > then we would have to change this, because Emacs rules require > that cl is only required during compilation. I know. That was my motivation for originally putting it in `eval-when-compile'. > I think that is a pity because it is *so* useful, but > there you go. My sentiments exactly. > So, maybe at some point you might want to replace the cl functions > with other code. Yes. I don't think there's any rush. Tom Breton (Tehom)