From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cecil Westerhof Subject: Re: Making a list to string Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:10:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1184220640.6283.185.camel@Barebusta.DecebalComp> References: <1184186606.6253.154.camel@Barebusta.DecebalComp> <1184217817.6283.165.camel@Barebusta.DecebalComp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8rsx-0006z7-UE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:10:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8rsw-0006yv-J6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:10:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8rsw-0006ys-Cu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:10:42 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I8rsv-0002O7-VV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:10:42 -0400 Received: from Barebusta.DecebalComp (DecebalComputing.xs4all.nl [213.84.157.201]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6C6Af4e095219 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:10:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from CecilWesterhof@xs4all.nl) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode Op do, 12-07-2007 te 01:04 -0500, schreef Eddward DeVilla: > On 7/12/07, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > > Yes, it looks like it works completly. (What I am missing is a knowledge > > of Lisp. Thus that will come.) > > > > One thing bugs me. I am used to end a formula ending with ';N'. > > By default the field values are passed to the lisp expression as a > string. If you want it to be passed as a number you need the ;N. So > if @3$4 = 123: > > '(foo @3$4) => '(foo "123") > '(foo @3$4);N => '(foo 123) I remember Carsten mentioning something about this. I would expect the ';N' have influence on the output, not on the input. -- Cecil Westerhof