From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cecil Westerhof Subject: Re: Strange problem with spreadsheet Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:45:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1182415525.20841.19.camel@Barebusta.DecebalComp> References: <1182414777.20841.14.camel@Barebusta.DecebalComp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1IIC-0005G3-Lu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:45:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1IIB-0005Fr-7K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:45:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1IIB-0005Fo-3q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:45:27 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.28]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I1IIA-00017r-Kt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:45:26 -0400 Received: from Barebusta.DecebalComp (DecebalComputing.xs4all.nl [213.84.157.201]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5L8jPUb018261 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:45:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from CecilWesterhof@xs4all.nl) In-Reply-To: <1182414777.20841.14.camel@Barebusta.DecebalComp> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode Op do, 21-06-2007 te 10:32 +0200, schreef Cecil Westerhof: > I have the following tables: > |-------------------| > | 22.50 | > | 16.50 | > |-------------------| > | :=vsum(@-II..@-I) | > |-------------------| > #+TBLFM: @3$1=vsum(@-II..@-I) > > |------------------------| > | 22.50 | > | 16.50 | > |------------------------| > | :=vsum(@-II..@-I);%.2f | > |------------------------| > #+TBLFM: @3$1=vsum(@-II..@-I);%.2f > > With the first I get '39.' when I let the table be evaluated. > But I want 39.00. That is why I created the second table. But here I get > on evaluation: 'Args out of range: 15,16'. > > I have the feeling that it could have something to do with the upgrade > to 4.78, but I am not sure. (Before I was using 4.71.) There is definitly something broken between 4.71 and 4.78. In a table I have :=vsum(@II..@-I);%.2f This worked without a problem. Now I get: Args out of rang: 14, 15 Also here when I remove the ';%.2f', it works. (But is not displayed the way I want.) -- Cecil Westerhof