From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: Re: Added support for "habit tracking" Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:55:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1175C839-0796-4E37-B468-AD3A2E70BA00@gmail.com> References: <87fx9erwn2.fsf@fastmail.fm> <4F1F6D95-0A72-4A24-998D-4625BC4A7437@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0Hzx-0002Y8-24 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:55:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0Hzv-0002XY-PR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:55:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33817 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N0Hzv-0002XS-KO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:55:47 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:27086) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0Hzv-0000lf-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:55:47 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1823722fga.12 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F1F6D95-0A72-4A24-998D-4625BC4A7437@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Matt Lundin , Org-mode Mode On Oct 20, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> 4. I currently use the tag :HABIT: to track habits. This allows for >> easy >> filtering in the agenda. I'm wondering whether there might be an >> option >> to designate habits with a user-defined tag rather than the STYLE >> property. The advantage would be much faster agenda searches for >> habits. > > I like the idea to shift this functionality to being a tag, also > because this is immediately visible. I will look at the idea of letting the user choose whether it will be a tag, what the name of that tag should be, or if it should use the STYLE property. I, for one, don't want categorical tags related to Org, but only contextual tags related to me. John