From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+] Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:29:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1098EF6E-EB88-475C-A96D-2BD449394BEA@gmail.com> References: <907065090908161814k63c0d518md09fc071e639b614@mail.gmail.com> <13103.1250473698@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <13768.1250476294@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <14151.1250477704@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdICF-0001Q1-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:29:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdICB-0001Og-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:29:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43031 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdICB-0001Od-M3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:29:23 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218]:53436) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdICB-0007uM-8n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:29:23 -0400 Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so2584924bwz.31 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:29:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14151.1250477704@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, waterloo Hi Nick and waterloo, I have now added the ulem package to support strike-through emphasis. Thanks for looking this up in the TeX docs. - Carsten On Aug 17, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Nick Dokos wrote: > >> ... >> The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ: >> >> http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike, >> >> is obtained using the ulem package: >> >> >> \usepackage{ulem} >> >> ... >> \sout{strike-through} >> ... >> >> > > ...or as the FAQ clearly states but I omitted to mention: > > \usepackage{soul} > > ... > \st{strike-through} > ... > > I don't know which of the two packages is "better", but as far > as the LaTeX exporter is concerned, they both present the same > problem. > > Nick > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode