From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make the latex export preprocessor rewrite #+INDEX to \index. Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:33:21 -0400 Message-ID: <10844.1303994001@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <1303991243-30731-1-git-send-email-rpgoldman@sift.info> <1303991243-30731-2-git-send-email-rpgoldman@sift.info> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFRM1-0005fA-T4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:34:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFRM1-0007XW-1o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:34:01 -0400 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:63437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFRM0-0007XK-Td for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:34:01 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LKD008L747MAI10@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:33:23 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from rpgoldman@sift.info of "Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:47:23 CDT." <1303991243-30731-2-git-send-email-rpgoldman@sift.info> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: rpgoldman@sift.info Cc: "Robert P. Goldman" , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org rpgoldman@sift.info wrote: > From: Robert P. Goldman > > --- > lisp/org-latex.el | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > ... Very nice! Did a small test and it works as advertised. Suggestion: maybe add an "I" easy template for it? This can be done per-user of course, so it is not strictly necessary and easy templates are experimental anyway, but it might be a good idea to reserve the "I" for this. Actually, it might be better to reserve "i" for this and shift the include to "I", since there will only be a few includes but potentially hundreds of index entries in a file. Thanks, Nick