Indeed, I now also understand so.

Let's drop this one.
 
08.10.2019, 13:59, "Nicolas Goaziou" <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:

Hello,

Anton Latukha <anton@latukha.com> writes:
 

 Additionally state that this is a holder of a function name, so the
 simple user did not get confused.


Your patch doesn't sound right. The value could be a lambda function, or
a symbol with a function value. Besides, "function name" is confusing.
It could mean, e.g., a string.

Regards,
 

--
Nicolas Goaziou
 
 
Regards,
Anton Latukha