From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Bremner Subject: Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 08:17:45 -0400 Message-ID: <0ty6td12qe.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> References: <87skjmastr.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4C51E509-1043-41DE-A8ED-DA8DA5592733@gmail.com> Reply-To: David Bremner Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0x7N-000343-53 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 08:17:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0x7I-00033r-EY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 08:17:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48077 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0x7I-00033o-9B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 08:17:52 -0400 Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.240.57]:50766) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0x7H-0004IU-W3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 08:17:52 -0400 Received: from bremner by pivot.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M0x7F-0006Nt-Qe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:17:49 -0300 In-Reply-To: <4C51E509-1043-41DE-A8ED-DA8DA5592733@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not > > emacs > > -Q for byte-compiling org-mode? > > this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I > am not even sure about Emacs 22. at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has "-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be possible to do something similar. Of course then you have switches depending on Emacs family, and I could see that being too much trouble. David