From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Filtering for effort in org-agenda Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: <0DCAB8F2-FD3E-471D-9818-ABD272568609@gmail.com> References: <87tz5aq48u.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ab72d9xs.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87iqlp3mxx.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <6A61D6DF-501B-422A-BBBE-D57382792201@gmail.com> <87eiwd3jz4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0618582273==" Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Loia7-00083v-1Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:21:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Loia2-00082z-2y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:21:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36395 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Loia1-00082w-Vb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:20:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:41337) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Loia1-0006ZR-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:20:57 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2824414ewy.42 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:20:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eiwd3jz4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bernt Hansen Cc: Org Mode List --===============0618582273== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-370457836 --Apple-Mail-1-370457836 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: >> >>> Carsten Dominik writes: >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: >>>>> >>> List of all TODO entries (excluding dated items) >>> / Limit to NEXT tagged tasks >>> / / Limit to effort <= 0 >>> / / / >>> C-c a t / N / + 1 >> >> You are now using "1" and have your first effort etimate set to zero >> minutes. >> I guess we could make "0" a special selection, not for the 10th >> effort >> step, but for no effort defined. Would that make sense? > > Sounds good to me. I still hit '0' instead of '1' by mistake > sometimes > ... and end up with everything < 8 hours :) I did that just this > morning. I ended up introducing a new operator "?" for this special purpose. So now, please filter C-c a t / N / + ? The comparing operators <, >, and = now all treat tasks without effort according to the setting in `org-sort-agenda-noeffort-means-high', as 0 or 32767 minutes, respectively. Matt, is that acceptable also for you, or do you want an option to actually totally ignore entries without an effort defined? Thanks to both of you, for the input. - Carsten --Apple-Mail-1-370457836 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mar 31, 2009, = at 3:22 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>= ; writes:

On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:18 PM, = Bernt Hansen wrote:

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>= ; writes:

On Mar = 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen = wrote:

=         List of all TODO entries = (excluding dated items)
=        /   Limit to NEXT = tagged tasks
=       /   / =     Limit to effort <=3D = 0
     /   / =     /
C-c a t / N / + = 1

You are now = using "1" and have your first effort etimate set to = zero
minutes.
I guess = we could make "0" a special selection, not for the 10th = effort
step, but for no effort = defined.  Would that make sense?

Sounds good to = me.  I still hit '0' instead of '1' by mistake sometimes
... and = end up with everything < 8 hours :) I did that just = this
morning.

I ended up = introducing a new operator "?" for this special purpose.
So = now, please filter

 C-c a t / N / + = ?

The comparing operators <, >, and =3D = now all treat tasks without effort according to the setting in = `org-sort-agenda-noeffort-means-high', as 0 or 32767 minutes, = respectively.

Matt, is that acceptable also for = you, or do you want an option to actually
totally ignore = entries without an effort defined?

Thanks to = both of you, for the input.

- = Carsten


= --Apple-Mail-1-370457836-- --===============0618582273== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============0618582273==--