From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Subject: Re: [odt/xhtml] Export lists as tables (list-tables)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:52:01 -1000
Message-ID: <0BF156E8-8AB1-4CB3-AFC8-08330A764387@tsdye.com>
References: <814o0wt5xy.fsf@gmail.com> <87liu66ep3.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAN_Dec-HFyDa4H-CrYFJ0ufO4QE2H4TCSJ3CG_DsysQ5ZT08jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87hb4u6che.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8E600)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40923)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1QzZmc-00013v-RY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:52:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1QzZmb-0001SI-M7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:52:10 -0400
Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:46659)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>)
	id 1QzZmb-0001S7-A9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:52:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87hb4u6che.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Would it be useful to be able to name lists, perhaps so they can be passed t=
o source code blocks just like tables?

Tom

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 2, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>=20
> Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> writes:
>=20
>> I think J's code handles both  xhtml &  odt exports; remember his
>> xhtml was originally developed as a possible basis for a new 'generic'
>> exporter. Given the goal of a general solution, why not just:
>>=20
>> #+attr: list-table
>=20
> Maybe when it will indeed be a general solution. But xhtml & odt isn't
> enough for that yet.
>=20
> Moreover, #+attr: keyword doesn't exist yet. I think we should
> keep #+attr_ for backend specific stuff, there are so many keywords
> available to choose from. For example, to be consistent with Babel,
> there is #+header:.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> --=20
> Nicolas Goaziou
>=20