From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: <0A3ABDDA-0F8B-44F3-9BC7-5EE8A7D6B12A@uva.nl> References: <200903192112.34725.jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> <200903200359.56081.jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ll7Ly-0007eR-TX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:59:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ll7Lu-0007bw-5n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:59:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41363 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ll7Lt-0007br-Vq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:59:30 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:57401) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ll7Lt-0000d1-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:59:29 -0400 Received: by mail-ew0-f160.google.com with SMTP id 4so1545841ewy.42 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:59:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200903200359.56081.jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jota Pin Cc: Peter Jones , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Jota Pin wrote: > Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a =E9crit : >> Jota Pin writes: >>> I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to =20 >>> contribute >>> to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d. >> >> I've been wondering something along the same lines myself. When >> switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long >> time because of archive items. Hi Peter, this case makes sense, for speed, and I have added a variable org-columns-skip-archived-trees, with default t. >> >> I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet. Maybe I'll try =20 >> to fix >> this tomorrow when I get some time. > > Thanks, this would be great. > > Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful: > > I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do =20= > want to > keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes =20 > archives tags > to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must =20= > no count > twice there... Hi Jota, for this case I am not sure. The purpose or archiving is to mark a tree as finished, but clearly any clocking times from this tree should still contribute. I see that you are using ARCHIVE to mark a second version of a given tree. If you need multiple versions, why don't you keep older versions in another file or so? Are there more opinions about this? Maybe I am seeing it wrong..... - Carsten > > Same question for clock tables. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode