From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: recursive todo/checkbox statistics Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:40:27 +0200 Message-ID: <06DF5FA0-9415-4A16-A35F-D08D2A0CE59A@gmail.com> References: <2e177a690905181511r481a27d2vae3a5a9d05d473f1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6Jd0-0005UG-2E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 03:20:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6Jcv-0005Sx-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 03:20:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42414 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6Jcv-0005Su-3E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 03:20:41 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:52758) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6Jcu-0002FK-JE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 03:20:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f162.google.com ([209.85.219.162]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6Jct-0006nH-Ls for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 03:20:40 -0400 Received: by mail-ew0-f162.google.com with SMTP id 6so4775367ewy.42 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 00:20:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2e177a690905181511r481a27d2vae3a5a9d05d473f1@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alexander Cc: emacs-orgmode We have had the same discussion recently about checkboxes, and added a variable org-hierarchical-checkbox-statistics. However, my personal view is that the outline hierarchy is different, because if you are organizing tasks into a hierarchy, so it does not make sense to add TODO's on different levels. - Carsten On May 19, 2009, at 12:11 AM, Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > Forgive me if there is an obvious way to do this that I haven't found. > > Is there an easy way to calculate the total number of tasks for a > file or a subtree? > For example, if the checkbox/todo progress cookie would calculate the > number of checkboxes/todos recursively for a subtree. > > so that this: > > * TODO heading 1 [1/3] > ** DONE task A > ** TODO task B > ** TODO task C > *** TODO task C1 > *** TODO task C2 > > would be this instead: > > * TODO heading 1 [1/5] > ** DONE task A > ** TODO task B > ** TODO task C > *** TODO task C1 > *** TODO task C2 > > I would be fine with any other solution as well, it was just that it > seems closest to the checkbox/todo functionality. > > Thanks you, > > Alexander > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode