From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Latex export proposed enhancement Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:08:49 +0100 Message-ID: <050F04FC-D191-4866-96D3-E4280E58E540@uva.nl> References: <496E5EB4.8080401@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPBwQ-0004ga-Id for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPBwP-0004g4-MW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44802 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPBwP-0004g1-K6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:33 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:15739) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPBwO-0007G1-UN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:33 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPBfh-0004ac-6r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:09:17 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 36so350627uga.17 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:09:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <496E5EB4.8080401@sift.info> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Goldman Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Robert, this is a reasonable expectation, and it should now work, please verify. The subtree needs to be selected as an active region, and the region must start as the headline, not before. - Carsten On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > Since we can export individual pieces of a single org-mode file, would > it be reasonable to make the latex class be a possible property on a > node, instead of requiring it to be set either on the file or through > variable binding? > > Best, > r > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode