Okay... I'm no coder but the relevant html seems to be:

./images/threearrows.png

Buried services suite

The source Org file is called (in Windows) \site\Experimental-manuals\Manual1.org Where folder "site" contains all the files. Manual1.org calls a dozen #+INCLUDEd Org files arrranged like this: site\foldername\filename.org using this format: in Manual1.org --------- * Introduction to this manual :scope: This is an experimental manual, with selected export. The selected text is based on the tag "scope". #+INCLUDE: "../foldername/filename.org" --------- The images are arranged like this: \site\foldername\images\picture.png All the image files are included in each of the filename.org files something like this: #+ATTR_HTML: width="500" height="500" align="center" #+CAPTION: My picture #+LABEL: fig:mypicure [[./images/mypicture.png]] When I export from filename.org (to LateX and html), the images obligingly appear. However when I export from Manual.org, there is the standard broken picture link. I suspect that the exporter is looking for the image in \site\Experimental-manuals\images\mypicture.png (which doesn't exist) where it should be looking in \site\foldername\images\mypicture.png Phew! John On , Jambunathan K wrote: > John > > Hi > > > > > > > > I am trying to export html from an Org file "A.org". The Org file is > largly > > constructed from other Org files "1.org", "2.org", "3.org", etc. via > > "#+INCLUDE:". These "1.org", "2.org", "3.org", etc. files have a number > of images > > included. > > > > > > > > However the images aren't included in the export of A.org. > > > > > > > > What I think is happening is that the images are being looked for in > the relative > > path from "A.org", whereas they should be looked at for in the relative > path from > > the "1.org", "2.org" files. Am I correct, and is there a workaround > (other than > > using an absolute path)? > > > Provide an example of dir organization, some simple orgfiles and the > generated html output samples. > The more the details and samples provided more there would be incentive > for someone to help you out. > Jambunathan K. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > John > --